Debt Limit Drama
Post from First Trust Economics Blog
Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist
Jan 29th, 2023
The US federal budget is on an unsustainable path…but not for the reasons that most people think.
Yes, the national debt is $31 trillion, well higher than annual GDP, and only going higher. Yes, the budget deficit last year was more than a $1 trillion for the third year in a row. None of this is good.
But the real root of the fiscal problem, and our biggest concern, isn’t the debt or the deficits, it’s government overspending. If the government had an enormous debt, but spent little, the private sector could produce the country’s way out of the debt problem. And if the US had little debt, we could still have economic problems from too much government spending. Ultimately, the government funds itself by borrowing or taxing the wealth produced by private industry. If spending were high and borrowing low, taxes would have to be prohibitively high. The bottom line is that excessive spending leads to economic ills.
According to the CBO, spending on entitlements like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs will rise from 10.7% of GDP to 15.1% in the next thirty years. Meanwhile, the net interest on the national debt will almost certainly be higher than it was last year, unless and until we bring the deficit down and slow the growth in debt.
This is why the debt limit debate now going on in Washington, DC is so important. Don’t fall for the false narrative that one group of politicians wants to push the country into default. Nor, should anyone want to abolish the debt ceiling altogether. If there is a way to shine some light on overspending, why shouldn’t it be used? If debt ceiling politics can focus attention on fiscal issues, it’s done its job.
What we expect is a last-minute budget deal that includes either caps on discretionary spending for future years, some sort of commission or committee that can make proposals to reform entitlements (with expedited procedural rules so the proposals get a congressional vote), or both, as part of a bipartisan deal to raise the debt ceiling.
But let’s go down the highly unlikely path that the debt limit isn’t raised. The Treasury Department would still have enough cash flow to pay all securitized debt as it came due, as well as entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. It’s true that other programs and agencies would have to take substantial cuts to make sure those higher priority payments get made; and yes, the Biden Administration will not enjoy making that choice. But it’s still a choice that they alone get to make.
Ultimately, investors and voters need to realize that not every national debt is the same, even if they’re the same amount. The US had a debt problem after the Revolutionary War, which was a small price to pay for starting an independent country. We had a debt problem after World War II, but that was a price we paid to win a crucial war. Our current debt problem is not like those. In too many cases, politicians spend to win favor with constituents. It’s not wrong to use the debt ceiling as a way to focus attention on this problem and the endemic overspending that it creates. That’s a habit this debt limit debate needs to break.