Resist Inflation Complacency
Post from First Trust Economics Blog
Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist
Sept 20th, 2021
Some analysts and investors breathed a big sigh of relief
on inflation when it was reported last week that the Consumer
Price Index rose 0.3% in August versus a consensus expected
0.4%. But we think any sense of relief is premature.
First, in no way, shape, or form, is a 0.3% increase in
consumer prices indicative of low inflation. Consumer prices
rose at a 3.3% annual rate in August, which is still well above
the Federal Reserve’s 2.0% target. Yes, we are well aware
that the official Fed inflation target is for the change in the
PCE deflator, which always runs a little lower than the
increase in the CPI, but it doesn’t run anywhere close to 1.3
points lower, which is what it’d have to do for the Fed to hit
the long-run 2.0% inflation target.
Second, a number of sectors had price declines in August
that should not persist. For example, airline fares fell 9.1% in
August and are now 17.4% below the average fares of 2019,
which was pre-COVID. So, as COVID gradually recedes
these prices should rise.
Third, housing rents are likely to accelerate sharply in
the years ahead, including for both actual tenants as well as
owners’ equivalent rent, which is the rental value of homes
occupied by homeowners. With the eviction moratorium in
place, rents have grown unusually slowly for the past eighteen
months. But, going back to the 1980s, rents tend to lag the
Case-Shiller home price index by about two years. Now, with
the national eviction moratorium finished, look for rents to
make up for lost time. And because rents make up more than
30% of the overall CPI, anyone predicting lower inflation
numbers in the future are saying other prices will fall.
Ultimately, however, it’s important to recognize that
inflation is still a monetary phenomenon and the M2 measure
of the money supply is up about 33% since February 2020,
pre-COVID. Eventually, that will translate into a substantial
rise in overall spending or nominal GDP (real GDP growth
plus inflation) and since the Fed has little to no control over
real GDP growth beyond the short-term, that means higher
inflation.
One way to think about it is that between the late 1950s
and early 1990s, the ratio of nominal GDP to M2 hovered in
a narrow range very close to 1.8. What that means is that
every new dollar of M2 translated into 1.8 more dollars of
spending. And if the ratio remains the same, then a 10%
increase in M2 leads to a 10% increase in overall (nominal)
spending.
This ratio rose in the 1990s. Interestingly, so did real
GDP growth. So, the strong real growth of the 1990s was
actually associated with lower inflation. Since then, the ratio
of GDP to M2 has generally dropped. Immediately prior to
COVID, in the last quarter of 2019, the ratio was 1.42; now
it’s 1.12. What this has meant is that M2 growth has not
translated directly to inflation.
However, let’s assume the ratio is headed back to the
1.42 that prevailed just before COVID. If nominal GDP
normally grows 4% per year – 2% real GDP growth plus 2%
inflation – it would take six years (so, 2027) to get back to that
1.42 ratio. But that’s only if M2 doesn’t grow in the interim.
No change at all. More likely, M2 does grow in the interim
and that additional growth feeds through directly to higher
inflation.
Another way to think about it is that the ratio of nominal
GDP to M2 has dropped because the velocity of money has
fallen. That’s the speed with which money circulates through
the economy. It’s hard to see velocity falling further from
1.12 because to do so means eventually going below 1, and
that has not happened in any recorded history of the US.
The Fed meets this week and will be issuing its usual
statement after the meeting. We don’t anticipate any
significant changes to monetary policy at this meeting,
although we do expect a hint that the Fed will announce a
tapering of quantitative easing to begin after the next meeting
in early November.
However, the Fed will also be releasing a new set of
economic projections as well as projections about the path of
short-term interest rates. Back in June, the Fed was
forecasting that inflation would be back down to roughly 2.0%
in 2022. If they make a similar forecast this week, it will be a
sign that it isn’t taking upward inflation risk nearly as
seriously as it should.